Evaluation of Sec. 2(h) of Indian Contract Act 1872

Evaluation Of Sec. 2(h) of Indian Contract Act 1872

Part 2 (h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that “an settlement enforceable by legislation is a contract.” If we make a deeper evaluation of the given definition, it incorporates two parts which itself bought many sub-analyses, i.e., settlement and authorized obligation. It additionally mentions the truth that all contracts are settlement however all agreements usually are not contract.

Furthermore, an settlement enforceable by legislation turns it into contract which signifies the type of legitimate contract. Additional, to spotlight what’s a legitimate contract, Part 2(h) have to be learn together with Part 10. And beneath Part 10, there are a number of interwoven Sections of Indian Contract Act, 1872 that ought to be witnessed to state an settlement to be legally enforceable turning it to be a legitimate contract. 

The necessities of a legitimate contract are –

  • Provide & acceptance, part 2(a) and part 2(b). Part 2(c) learn together with part 2(a) & (b). 

There have to be the weather of legitimate provide & legitimate acceptance. For e.g.- sure sections of the Contract Act,1872 consists of Sec. 7, Sec. 7(1) & Sec. 7(2). 

  • Intention to create authorized relations: A proposal have to be such that when accepted it can lead to a legitimate contract. A mere social invitation can’t be thought to be a proposal, as a result of if such an invite is accepted it won’t give rise to any authorized relationship. e.g.- Balfour vs. Balfour, 1919 2 KB 571.
  • Phrases of the provide have to be clear and particular: Data of the Intention of the events may be very important as with out this the courts will be unable to resolve what the events need to do. Due to this fact, the phrases of the provide have to be clear and particular and never obscure and free. 
  • Should create a authorized relationship: It’s important for a legitimate proposal that it have to be made with the intention of making a authorized relationship in any other case it can solely be an invite. A social invitation could not create a social relationship. A proposal should result in a contract which creates authorized obligations and authorized penalties within the case of non-performance of the contract.


Sec. 2(a) denotes, “when one individual signifies to a different his willingness to do or to abstain from doing something, with a view to acquiring the assent of that different to such act or abstinence, he’s stated to make a proposal.

Sec. 2(b) denotes, “when the individual to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent thereto, the proposal is alleged to be accepted. A proposal when accepted turns into a promise.

Nevertheless, there have to be lawful provide and lawful acceptance. 

The necessities of a lawful provide are – 

  • A proposal could also be categorical or implied. (Sec. 9).
  • A proposal have to be able to creating authorized relation.
  • Particular, unambiguous and sure in nature. (Sec. 29).
  • An invite to supply is not any provide.
  • Provide have to be communicated. (Sec. 4)
  • Provide is likely to be normal or particular. 
  • Provide have to be within the view to acquiring free consent. (Sec. 13 & Sec. 14 learn together with Sec. 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21 & 22.
  • Two equivalent cross – provides don’t make a legitimate provide.
  • A proposal might be made topic to any phrases and situations. Additional, if the offeror doesn’t talk or inform the offeree in regards to the deviated acceptance from the offeree, the offeror is deemed to have accepted the deviated acceptance. (Sec. 7)

The necessities of lawful acceptance are – 

  • Acceptance have to be given by the individual to whom a proposal is made. Nevertheless, there’s an exception in case of the agent and principal beneath Sec. 182.
  • Acceptance have to be absolute and unqualified. Below Sec. 7(1).
  • Acceptance have to be expressed in some regular and affordable method, except the proposal prescribes the style wherein it’s to be acted. Below Sec. 7(2).
  • Acceptance have to be communicated by the accepter.
  • Acceptance have to be given inside an affordable time and earlier than the provide lapses and/or revoked. Below Sec. 6(2), Sec.7, Sec. 6(4), Sec. 6(1), Sec. 6(3).
  • Acceptance should succeed the provide. 
  • Rejected provides might be accepted solely, if renewed.   

Sec 2(c) denotes the labelling of “promisor and promisee”. 

The individual making the proposal known as the promisor, and the individual accepting the proposal known as the promisee.

There have to be a authorized intention behind each provide and acceptance turning into promise and the promise together with lawful consideration turning into an settlement enforceable by legislation is a legitimate contract. (Sec. 2(d) and Sec. 23). 

Within the landmark case of Balfour vs. Balfour, 1919 2 KB 571, Mrs. Balfour’s motion was dismissed on the bottom that there was no authorized intention between Mr. and Mrs. Balfour’s verbal promise to a upkeep charge of 30 kilos to be ship by Mr. Balfour each month because it was denoted as an final result of home relation out of affection and love with none writing and registration. Sec. 25(1). 

The place a legitimate provide and legitimate acceptance establishes a promise between the offeror and the acceptor, the promise when will get mixed with the mutual consideration results in an settlement. 

Right here, comes the Sec. 2(d) and Sec. 23. 

Sec. 2(d) denotes, “when on the want of the promisor, the promisee or another individual has performed or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or guarantees to do or to abstain from doing, such act or abstinence or promise known as a consideration for the promise.

Now, Sec. 2(d) is learn together with Sec.23 which means, lawful consideration. A consideration is ‘lawful’, except, it’s forbidden by legislation; or is of such a nature that, if permitted it will defeat the provisions of any legislation; or is fraudulent; or entails or implies damage to the individual or property of one other; or is immoral; or is against public coverage.

Speaking in regards to the presence of Capability of Events, Sec. 11 states that “in an effort to be competent to contract the events have to be of the age of majority and of sound thoughts and should not be disqualified from contracting by any legislation to which they’re topic.”   Sec. 12 talks in regards to the sound thoughts whereas coming into right into a contract.      It is usually learn together with Sec. 68, which states that, “if any of the events to the settlement suffers from minority, lunacy idiocy, drunkenness, and so on., the settlement will not be enforceable at legislation, besides in particular instances, e.g.- within the case of necessaries equipped to a minor or lunatic, the provider of products is entitled to be reimbursed from their property.

Consensus-ad-idem signifies the assembly of minds, which implies the events should give consent upon the identical factor in the identical sense. (Sec. 13). 

Additional, free consent, laid down in Sec. 14 signifies, “consent is alleged to be free” when, it isn’t precipitated by-

  • Coercion, Sec. 15.
  • Undue Affect, Sec. 16.
  • Misrepresentation, Sec. 18.
  • Fraud, Sec. 17.
  • Mistake, Sec. 20, 21 and 22.

Sec. 21 implies, “mistake of legislation of the nation or mistake of legislation.”

Sec. 20 implies, “bilateral mistake” and Sec. 22 implies, “unilateral mistake”.

Sec. 56 lays down that, “an settlement to do an act unattainable in itself is void.” 

It’s learn together with Sec. 32, which means that, “a contingent contract to do or to not do one thing if an unsure future occasion occurs, can’t be enforced by legislation except and till the occasion has occurred. If the occasion turns into unattainable, such contract turns into void.” 

Once more, it may be in flip learn together with Sec. 36 which means that, “agreements contingent on unattainable occasion is void.” 

 If we indulge deep into Sec. 56 and 32 and 36, it witnesses the assent of Sec. 53.

 Sec. 53 states that, “when a contract incorporates reciprocal guarantees, and one celebration to the contract prevents the opposite from performing his promise, then the contract turns into voidable on the possibility of the celebration so prevented.” 

Right here once more comes the presence of Sec. 2(f) which signifies that “guarantees which kind the consideration or a part of the consideration for one another, are referred to as reciprocal guarantees.

Now, as Sec. 56, 53, 32 altogether talks about Void and Voidable contract, an essence of Sec. 2(i) and Sec. 2(j) might be discovered. 

Sec. 2(i) talks about “an settlement which is enforceable by legislation on the possibility of a number of of the events thereto, however not on the possibility of the opposite or others, is a voidable contract.” 

Sec. 2(j) talks about, “a contract which ceases to be enforceable by legislation turns into void, when it ceases to be enforceable.” (Learn together with Sec. 2(g).

Sec. 24 to 30, specify, sure sorts of agreements which have been expressly declared void. 

The agreements which were expressly declared void are as follows – 

  • Agreements in restraint of marriage. (Sec. 26)
  • Agreements in restraint of commerce. (Sec. 27)
  • Agreements in restraint of authorized proceedings. (Sec. 28)
  • Agreements, the that means of which is unsure. (Sec. 29)
  • Agreements by means of wager. (Sec. 30). It can be learn together with Sec. 294-A of the IPC declaring ‘conducting of lottery’ a punishable offense. 
  • Agreements contingent on unattainable occasions. (Sec. 36) learn together with (Sec. 32)
  • Agreements to do unattainable acts. (Sec. 56)
  1. Expression of the willingness
  2. It have to be to a different individual
  3. Have to be made with a view to acquiring the assent of the opposite individual

Now, beneath this Sec. we will additionally come throughout a hidden requirement, i.e., the assent of the opposite individual (offeree) have to be beneath free consent with none factor of coercion, fraud, undue affect, misrepresentation or mistake. Thus, with out continuing additional we come throughout the truth that Sec. 2(a) has the presence of Sec. 14 in it which in flip has the contact of Sec. 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22.
Once more, the place Sec. 2(b) talks in regards to the definition of acceptance, it itself consists of the hidden clauses of free consent. After a lawful provide is made, it’s lawfully accepted giving rise to a promise.
Nevertheless, the promise should get clubbed with mutual consideration which is just too large in idea beneath Contract Legislation, 1872 as a result of inclusion of three issues, namely- a) the timeline of past-present-future, b) the scope of act, abstinence & promise, c) a normal Legislation of Contract. This in flip offers rise to an settlement. And the settlement in flip have to be enforceable within the court docket of legislation, thus constituting a legitimate contract.
Right here, let’s take a pause, and analyze the sections and sub-sections hidden inside it.
A promise, i.e., Sec. 2(c) should get clubbed with Sec. 2(d), however to represent a legitimate settlement, Sec. 2(d) should get clubbed with Sec. 23. Right here, its not the top. Once more, Sec. 2(c), Sec. 2(d) and Sec. 23 should get clubbed with Sec. 2(h), which is able to compose to a legitimate contract.
Nevertheless, there’s a loophole. If we membership Sec. 2(c), Sec. 2(d) and Sec. 23 we get an settlement. Now, look into the loophole. Sec. 2(h) states, solely the phrase settlement in its definition, however not legitimate settlement. If we had been to compose a legitimate contract, solely a mere settlement will not be sufficient. It have to be a legitimate settlement. So, a legitimate settlement in flip is a compilation of quite a lot of sections and necessities. (As talked about within the cross-sectional evaluation).

What do you think?

Written by colin


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Greenwood County Jail Hit with Negligence Lawsuit After Inmate Dying

Forging an Empire –